Partnership of Civilizations
International Scientific-Practical Journal
The Editorial Board
- A.I. Ageev (Editor-in-Chief for “The Partnership of Civilizations” Journal)
- T.T. Timofeev (Deputy Chief Editor)
- S. Farah (Deputy Chief Editor)
- O.P. Yermilina (Executive Editor)
- N.M. Guseinova (Literary Editor)
- Yu.V. Dorovskaya (English translation)
- B.D. Shulgin (Design, Layout)
- Yu.V. Strelnikova (Proofreader)
- I.P. Yershova (Printing Manager)
- V.M. Kokuev (Internet Projects)
- Yu.S. Leonova (Subscription Department)
All inquiries about e-subscription to “The Partnership of Civilizations” journal should be addressed to: (495) 234 4693; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org (the reference should be made to e-subscription to “The Partnership of Civilizations” journal)
Editors’ address: Office 4, bld. 1, 6/1, Sretensky Blvd., Moscow, 101000, Russia
Tel./fax: (495) 234 4693
© P. Sorokin – N. Kondratieff International Institute
Frequency of appearance – 4 times a year.
Number of copies 1,000
- Pitirim Sorokin-Nikolai Kondratieff International Institute;
- Institute for Economic Strategies;
- MGIMO-University Center for Partnership of Civilizations;
- Center for Civilization Studies of the Institute of Europe RAS;
- International Futures Studies Academy;
- Lebanese-Russian House;
- Organization for Promoting Global Civilization (China).
The Scientific Editorial Board for the Partnership of Civilization s Journal:
- Yakovets, Yuri Vladimirovich – Professor, RANS Academician, President of the Pitirim Sorokin – Nikolai Kondratieff International Institute (Chairman of the Board)
- Ageev, Alexander Ivanovich – Professor, RANS Academician, Editor-in-Chief of the journal, President of the International Futures Studies Academy (Deputy Chairman of the Board)
- Farah Suheil – Professor at the Lebanese University, RAS and RANS Academician (Deputy Chairman of the Board)
- Valeev, Khusain Khasenovich – Professor, member of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
- Vinokurova, Uliana Alexeevna – Professor, RANS Academician, Prorector of the Russian State University of Arts and Culture
- Glaziev, Sergey Yurievich – RAS Academician, EurAsEC Deputy Secretary General
- Zapesotsky, Alexander Sergeevich – RAS Academician, Rector of the Saint Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions
- Kuzyk, Boris Nikolaevich – RAS Corresponding Member, Director of the Institute for Economic Strategies
- Mathews Robin – Professor at Kingston University (UK)
- Maurice Emar – Professor at Paris Sorbonne University, Chairman of the Council for Social and Human Sciences UNES CO (France)
- Popov, Veniamin Viktorovich – Professor, Director of the Centre for Partnership of Civilizations of the Institute for International Research at Moscow State Institute for International Relations (University) under the RF Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Timofeev, Timur Timofeevich – RAS corresponding member, Director of the Center for Civilization Studies of the Institute of Europe RAS
- Tokovinin, Alexander Avrelievich – Director of the Department of the RF Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Zhang Shaohua – R AS foreign member, Chairman of the OPGC (Organization for Promoting Global Civilization) (China)
- Chistilin, Dmitry Konstantinovich – RAS foreign member, Simon Kuznets International Institute for Self-Organization and Development (Ukraine)
- Shmelev, Nikolai Pavlovich – RAS Academician, Director of the Institute of Europe RAS
The Logic of Dialogue
There is something capitulating in the category of civilizations.
Unable to cope with the immense volume and diversity of billions of individual fates and millions of stories of societies and states, science has offered a cliche bringing the diversity to a fully observable set of civilizations. But this discovery was not in vain. And today the development of civilization themes is among the most promising and significant for a new revolution of consciousness ongoing before our eyes.
Any change in the formats of life is preceded by a new worldview and experience – “the son of hard mistakes.”What is particularly important from the historical experience to us, the witnesses and participants of the new revolution?
First, the lesson of diversity. The 20th century tried to bring diversity to the two social systems by the criterion of the political regime and the type of property. The venture was clearly unsuccessful. Some under the flag of non-alignment with the logic of dualism, other seeing signs of convergence, and others in search of a way – each in their own way, relying on their own prophets, founders, the tribunes and the leaders, but little by little, step by step approved the uniqueness and historical choice and sovereignty of their countries and peoples. All a peculiar kind of communities began to take shape of coalitions later. Someone were brought together by common language, culture, fates, the neighborhood, landscape, ethnogenetic potential, – by the outcome of battles among themselves or with others, some – by economic interests or the unity of strategic aspirations.
As a result, it was formed not dual, but plural civilizational order. And each of modern civilizations has its own world view, view on human, the meaning of life, on the past, present and future.
Second, the lesson of the common heritage. With all the diversity that has deep meaning – “For there also must be factions among you, that those who are approved may be revealed among you.” (1 Corinthians.11:19), and from the cosmos, and in comparison with the other inhabitants of the planet, man has reached the heights of development through the collective efforts of its common mind, the noosphere. Not coincidentally, great scientists, and the great prophets and the leaders of transformations are fairly evenly distributed in space of civilizations and together constitute the treasury of the wisdom of all humanity. And examples of inhuman experiments are not at all the prerogative of Europe, Asia or America.
All or nearly all distinguished themselves ploughing around the right social order. And this experience is the property of all inhabitants of the Earth for all time.
Third, the lesson of communications. The biggest trouble that occurred with humanity may be called the “gap of communications.” Disregard for nature, for other peoples, other persons, science and religion, art and justice – all of which have the common denominator – the inability, unwillingness to communicate and respect the rights, freedoms and dignity of others. Communicating understand each other better than keeping silence. At least communication gives a chance to be understood. While knowledge of the laws of nature and life and an awareness of responsibility for compliance with or violation of these laws communicate facets to freedom.
Every civilization whatever definition is given to, is the quintessence of life experience on the earth of many generations of people. That’s why all three lessons lead to one conclusion – everyone becomes stronger and wiser, entering into dialogue with the people other by experience of their being. Dialogue is the threshold of a partnership that is self-valuable. Especially now when we all unnoticeably but more and more clearly are aware of how our planet is small and fragile.
A.I. Ageev, Editor-in-Chief